When I published West Of
Independence, I did not expect a never-ending stream of five-star reviews. The
topics of homosexuality, suicide, and family relationships are white-hot
emotional launch buttons when dealt with individually, and my story blends
them all together.
An
interesting two-star review of West Of Independence was posted on Amazon today.
I am not sure what the reader wanted, but it sounds like they were expecting a
manual with all the answers, a black and white map detailing the motives and
emotions of every character, followed by sweet redemption for all involved.
But
I am a writer, not an explorer or a cartographer; I couldn't draw a map of my
own bedroom, let alone a map of the human heart (mine or anyone else's). I don't think it was my duty to tell my readers what to take from the story; this is neither a textbook or an operations manual.
I will say this: the
suicide of a loved one brings everyone involved to their knees, and leaves them
with more questions than answers, more guilt than redemption, and more
turbulence than peace. Jared has been dead for almost four years, and just
yesterday I stood in the garden center of Home Depot amidst a rush of people,
with a bag of fertilizer in my cart, tears falling down my cheeks, and panic in
my chest. These moments come and go in waves, without any sort of forecast or
pattern to provide warning.
I
didn't write West Of Independence to explain, absolve, empathize, or lay blame,
and I certainly didn't intend to answer any questions (especially since I don't
have the answers). I wrote it to tell the story as it happened (from my point
of view), so that others might learn from it and spare themselves the same
experience. Judging from the feedback that has been flowing in over the past
month, that just might happen for some. People of all ages and circumstances
have reached out with their own stories, their own challenges, and to share
with me their own change of heart upon reading West Of Independence. To hear
them share their feelings is thrilling; not just because my writing has had an
impact on their lives, but because I have learned that the more we share of
ourselves, the more able and willing we become to bear one another's burdens
and sometimes even help to remove them altogether.
And
so I don't mind that someone sees the book as too ambitious, or feels that it
falls short of the mark that they have chosen for it. I had a mark in mind when
I wrote it, and it wasn't to become an overnight literary success and a standard for writers in general.
It was to help at least one person, and yes, that one person was me.
Anyone
else was to be a bonus.
Amen. Thick skin isn't easy to acquire when you aren't born with it...still trying to find mine. Two stars only means they didn't get it and that's too bad for them.
ReplyDeleteI read the 2 star review. The poster seemed to love the concept, and felt the story was important, but that the delivery needed polishing. Whether one agrees or not, there didn't seem to be any personal attack in the review. In fact, the reviewer wrote an anticipation for Matthew's future writings. I think it was meant as constructive criticism, so that his books would continue to improve and be at the level of being reviewed by literary bloggers, Oprah, etc.
ReplyDelete